1. Comparison of average peak push forces required to advance Laser Sheath at 40Hz vs. 80Hz Pulse Repetition Rate through simulated fibrosis material at an advancement rate of 1.0 mm/second. D015722. Datos de archivo de Philips
2. Comparison of ablation force vs. advancement rate of Laser sheath 40Hz vs. 80Hz by use of the data collected in D015786. Datos de archivo de Philips
3. Maytin M, Epstein, L (2011). The challenges of transvenous lead extraction. Heart, 97(5): 425-34.
4. Henrikson, C.A., et al. (2008). How to prevent, recognize, and manage complications of lead extraction. Part III: Procedural factors Heart Rhythm. Jul;5(7):1083-7. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
5. Smith MC, Love CJ. Extraction of transvenous pacing and ICD leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008:31:736-52.
6. Wilkoff, B.L., et al. (1999). Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: Results of the Pacing Lead Extraction with Excimer Sheath (PLEXES) trial. JACC, 33(6), 1671-1676.
7. Reduced advancement force lowers the forces applied to leads during extraction, D015861-01. Datos de archivo de Philips
8. Design Verification Report for Ablation Force Testing. D015722. Datos de archivo de Philips.
La disponibilidad de productos está sujeta a autorización normativa. Póngase en contacto con el representante de ventas local para comprobar la disponibilidad en su país.
LifeSystems distribuye GlideLight en Australia y Nueva Zelanda.